Below are statements from a web site who’s owner has turned to believing that Shaul is “the abomination that makes desolate” because it’s his words that are used by Xtianity to promote lawlessness and mang-d teachings. 

I know this person to some degree and find it unfortunate that she has gone this route in her beliefs.  In this article I have posted some of the varying erroneous statements/judgments made against Shaul.

Gail:  Are you aware that Paul taught with a forked tongue, both the keeping of the Torah and the breaking of it, sometimes in the very same series of verses?  Paul never fully committed to teaching  the Torah to his churches, and more often came out against it with a mixture of confusing terms that leave one wondering what he really believed! 

It is true that from Paul's words, it is possible to teach Torah observance AND Torah abolishment. Have you ever had trouble explaining that  Paul actually taught the keeping of the Torah to others? That is because other people who don't want to keep the Torah use Paul's confusing statements to justify their lawlessness. 

Perhaps you have had trouble showing people that Paul taught that the Torah had been fulfilled in Jesus Christ and is no longer to be kept by Chrisitians. That is because scattered throughout Paul's epistles are glimpses of both sides. Paul sought to please all men, and so he preached a gospel that was appealing to both Torah observant and non-Torah observant Jews and Gentiles. 

J.R : Slander is the worst thing someone can put out against another, especially when that slander is offered with no proof.  This is done in the comments above and it is fairly sad to see.  First, she accuses Shaul of speaking with a forked tongue but there’s no proof offered of such, where is it that Shaul spoke with a forked tongue but in the eyes of confused people. 

Those who have escaped Xtianity and has come to realize that it is a false/erroneous religion but make a crucial mistake when they assume Shaul or/and the Brit Chadasha is false.  People MUST understand that not only are Shaul’s words misinterpreted many times but in many places his words were intentionally mistranslated by BIASED individuals to lift up their erroneous beliefs.

There are no places in scripture where Shaul ever spoke against Torah.  It is a grave mistake to take the arguments of the enemy to try to come to truth about a matter.  Just because the confused/erroneous/false religion of Xtianity upholds Shaul as their Apostle for Anomia (Lawlessness) does not make it so.  We MUST remember that churchianity is made up of very ignorant, unknowledgeable, confused people who will of course totally misrepresent what Shaul has said.

Gail:  This man hanging from this cross by his nail-pinned hands and feet is viewed as the Creator YHWH himself!   Mankind has been led to "imagine" with their minds, that the Great Creator of the Universe became a man and allowed himself to be nailed to a cross, for the sake of doing away with his own eternal Torah!

J.R : Okay, here Gail speaks about how the mang-d hanging on a tree is the image that Shaul words has created in the minds of Christians.  This point is in serious error and shows a very biased judgment against Shaul.  We know that Xtianity uses not only Shaul’s word but the words of Yochanan and the entirety of scriptures to prove their Babylonian mang-d theology. 

The book of good news presented by Yochanan is used far above Shaul’s word to prove Trinity.  With this fact will we also accuse Yochanan of working with the harlot or is it understood that Xtianity confuses the words of Yochanan and Shaul to prove their false doctrines? 

This is done NOT because Yochanan or Shaul promoted false doctrines but Error because it is Yochanan’s confusing statements (to those who are ignorant and blind and hooked on the confusing wine of Babylon) that are promoted as teaching that Meshiach was some G-d come in the flesh as a man so why is this blame only put on Shaul only?

Gail has no chose here but to also accuse Yochanan of falsehood based on her standards of judgment.  Not only that but she would have to then reject the entire Brit Chadasha as well since it too is used by CONFUSED individuals to promote the false religion of Xtianity by many miracles, signs, wonders, etc.

Gail: The answer to the question, since the time of Yahushua, Rome-through Paul’s writings – has persecuted those attempting to follow YHWH’s ways. Rome destroyed Yahushua’s body! And then Rome-through Paul’s writings- destroyed the bodies of countless of his faithful students and disciples. 

But did Rome stop there? NO,–through Paul’s writings – created its own “messiah” for belief in through the imagination (faith), based on Greek Mythological god-man / goddess philosophy, cuased the world to look upon his dying body as though this were the creator himself dying so that we could live without his law.

This image is literally implanted in the minds (foreheads) of Christians worldwide! Christianity/Rome – through Paul’s writings- has made an idol out of a man-god hanging on a corss in order to abolish that Torah that Yahushua’s precious life was a glorious, fulfilling testimony to!

J.R :  Amazing that Gail totally ignore the FACT that Xtianity also uses the entirety of the Brit Chadasha and even parts of the Tanakh in the OWN confusion to promote error. Should we rid ourselves of those things too.  Is Yochanan responsible for his hard sayings that have been confused BY Xtianity to promote Trinity?  Christianity/Rome through the Brit Chadasha has done MANY THINGS. 

Did you notice what happened above?  Gail continuously points out correctly what ROMEhas done, it's not Yochanan, it's not Shaul, it's not the Brit Chadasha, it is Christianity/ROME that has done these things, period.

Amazing that in the entire article she has written there are NO proofs offered of anywhere that Shaul makes statements in support of the false pagan g-d “Jesus the Christ”.  She provided not one piece of evidence to prove her points, all that was done here is blame the gun for being made instead of blaming the shooter for his murderous heart. 

This is no different than blaming the knife (who’s purpose is to cut food) for the stabbing rather than blaming  the individual (who has used the knife against it’s intended purposes) for the ACTION!  In her slander no where does she prove her points, the only thing done in the article is a lot of ranting and raving against an innocent man which plays right into the enemies hand.

We CANNOT blame Shaul for many doing exactly what Kepha said would happen (the wresting of Shaul’s words to their own damnation because they are HARD sayings, Kepha did not say that Shaul was in error but those who wrest his words). If Gail were to be honest with her standards she would have no choice but to also reject the Brit Chadasha altogether and thus even Yeshua HaMashiach who it speaks of.  It is hard for me to see someone reject Shaul without eventually coming to reject the Brit Chadasha and eventually Meshiach altogether.