Why does history record so much violence and intense anger roused in the Trinitarian believer in defense of what even he admits is largely a baffling mystery? Doctrine of the Trinity p.301

Regarding the doctrine of the Trinity:

It was achieved with the help of coercion, the sword, torture, and the massive weight of pressure from a coalition of clergy and the state joined in an unholy alliance, and benefitting from a mysterious concept. Calling itself the Holy Roman Empire, however, scarcely reflected its real nature. Doctrine of the Trinity p. 308

Its amazing how the above so accurately reflects the spirit found today in a majority of those who supports this mysterious and confusing doctrine. Why is the spirit that is those that support the doctrine so vehement and so nasty in its actions toward those who dare to question this doctrine?

Many have stated that the Trinity is the most crucial foundational teaching of Xtianity. This unfortunately is true for the religion of Xtianity but it is not the foundational teaching of Scripture nor the original faith. Xtians elevate a doctrine that is never taught in Scriptures, a doctrine that if so important, seemed to go over the heads of the followers of Yahshua. Why is it that such an important doctrine founds itself supposedly proven through hints, massive inference, and biased interpretations?

This reminds me of the same traits I began to find in the false doctrine of "unknown tongues". My old church taught that this doctrine was barely second to salvation itself and that one who rejected it could not possibly remain a believer. My question then as it is now for "Trinity" is why are these doctrines being promoted in a greater fashions than Scriptures themselves? We have been duped into thinking that Trinitarianism has always been around, but folks that lie comes from the Satan himself.

The church fails to realize (or intentionally chooses to not recognize) that such an idea would have been a revolutionized way of thinking about what and who Elohim is. Some Jews had debates with the followers of Yahshua concerning circumcision, Torah, traditions, etc. Trinity being apart of the original faith would have caused an uproar in Yerushalayim and yet there is none mentioned.

We have two options; either theres silence on TEACHINGS (not supposed hints, and proof text) concerning the Trinity because A: The Jews and new believers already accepted such a concept of their Elohim or B: Because no such teaching existed until paganized "Fathers" introduced such Babylonish concepts into the faith.

Simple historic research would immediately reveal to any honest seeker that the Jews nor the new believers (who were Jews) did not, could not, and would not hold such a concept of their Elohim and rightfully so. Elohim on Mt. Sinai distinctively separated the Yisraelites into understanding that He was the one true Elohim separate from the false elohims of the nations (which were always polytheistic). Yisrael would be the only distinct people worshiping a Elohim in a monotheistic fashion. The Xtian would say "I dont worship three G-ds because there one." The contradiction comes when they just as easily state that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each G-d, co-equal (meaning each individual is fully G-d), co-eternal, and co-existent (which again make them separate individuals with the rank of G-d). Such statements make the Trinity a doctrine of three g-ds.

Xtians will explain how there one G-d because there one in purpose, unity, etc. My friend that then results in three g-ds who are united in their cause, purpose, and will. However they remain three separate g-ds. No matter how you try to explain away the truth the fact is that no matter how unified they are they are still separate entities being G-d.

If three people (lets say triplets for greater effect) were the head of a company they could not call themselves one CEO. There would be no argument about it, everyone would realize that the particular company had three CEOs no matter how unified they were. Four speakers on a stereo system (though unified in purpose and make up) would not be referred to as "speaker" or "the speaker", one would refer to them as either speakers, four speakers. The only way a person could utter speaker is if they were speaking of one individual speaker at a time not all four. Three cannot ever be one nor can one be three.

Back to the original topic:

Why is it that a person endures rebuke, questioning of their salvation, disfellowship, ousting, being branded as a heretic based on the questioning of a doctrine that is nowhere explicitly found in Scripture? Nowhere is there a commandment stating that one must confess Yahshua as Elohim but yet people make that a standard for posting on message boards, fellowshipping, membership in a church, etc.

Yahshua never claimed to be Elohim but yet people are persecuted for not bowing the knee to the unholy, unscriptural, unfounded, unsubstantiated, mysterious doctrine of Trinity. If "sola scriptura" is the supposed standard, where is any command to pressure, coerce, persecute, rebuke, teach, or follow the doctrine of Trinity from Scripture?

For those that persecute, question the salvation, and harass people who reject Trinity may I ask what is your foundation for doing so? There are no Scriptures commanding or asking anyone to believe that Yahshua was G-d or YHWH of the Tanach. There are plenty of Scriptures telling us to believe on him as the promised Meshiach and son of G-d.

Theres no teachings, doctrines, or concepts that come from the writings of any of the saints throughout all the Scriptures of such ideas. Theres plenty of supposed hints and proof text but you will find no explicit teaching from any of the saints that we know for a fact served Elohim in truth.

There is never a time that Yahshua ever claimed to be G-d or to have been YHWH in the Tanach. Why are words put into his mouth? You can have all the supposed proof text that you want but you do not have Yahshua stating "I was YHWH in the Tanach" or " I am G-d" or "I am G-d with G-d" or "Im G-d come down in the flesh". But yet everyone looks at us who reject these ideas as crazy. You do have a very clear cut scripture where Yahshua backs away from the false claim of the Jews that he was claiming to be Elohim. He points out rather clearly that representatives of Elohim could indeed be Elohims in the secondary sense without controversy. Scriptures make it clear that the judges of Yisrael, the righteous of Yisrael, Moses, and others were called Elohims and were Elohims in the secondary sense.

Lastly, YHWH Himself never states that we must believe Yahshua was Him or another person of a Trinity. The Father does tell us that he is His son. So why are people going above and beyond what even the true Elohim had to say in the matter? Stop all of the persecution and reexamine why you hold to such a baffling mystery.

Do not misunderstand me, I myself speak very negatively about the doctrine of Trinity as I believe its straight from Satan and one of the greatest deceptions on earth. However I will not persecute, harass, question the salvation, or slander an individual who believes in the doctrine. Why is it that historically and presently this has failed to be so from those who hold to something that they must admit is not clearly found in Scripture and is a mystery that they themselves cant explain.

Why is it that these very same people demand we follow after their mysteries. Scriptures say nothing about there being a mystery to who and what Elohim is. It is man that has made it a mystery. I have no quarrels about seeing any confusion and mysteries that causes confusion as being straight from the adversary himself.

Is it not amazing that Revelation identifies an adversary to Elohim and his people as MYSTERY Babylon. Have you ever notice the strange, mysterious, hard to find (except through hints and proof verses), contradictory doctrines that come from her? Unknown tongues, Pretribulation Rapture, Faith movement, Sunday worship, Xmas & Easter all seem to have the same traits involved in them. I deal with this issue in the article False Doctrines.